David, One problem is there is no collaboration on same thing! Please keep TiddlyToolmap updated! This is one place to record what we have on TW. I see many work just buried in this forum (not easy to find stuff, not easy to organize! and of course not for collaboration!).
/Mohammad On Saturday, June 16, 2018 at 6:37:45 PM UTC+4:30, David Gifford wrote: > > See my comment below in *bold*. Your replies to Mohammad are right on. > > On Saturday, June 16, 2018 at 7:03:47 AM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Ciao Mohammad >> >> A few comments that maybe help you get where TW is. >> >> Mohammad wrote: >>> >>> This is a great place to find resources on TW. >>> >> >> Absolutely. TiddlyToolMap >> <https://dynalist.io/d/zUP-nIWu2FFoXH-oM7L7d9DM>, whatever its limits, >> is the best Resource Reference for users TW has ever had. >> >> >>> One improvement could come by help of other users (specially developers, >>> advanced users) to check and review those resources and give their >>> recommendation! >>> >> >> The problem is that TiddlyToolMap is just one person's work. Its held on >> a very simple online outliner. It has no interactive tools. >> >> The best bet is to LOBBY (push for) it to be collectively adopted and >> made into a full-scale data repository where up-voting and notes become >> possible by developers and others. >> >> BUT David is just doing what he can easily so we should never make that >> his problem. >> >> Right now he IS TiddlyToolMap. But he has already said >> >> *...* >>> >>> *I would hope that ... people ... would feel free to use the info in my >>>> toolmap to create similar things according to the criteria they set.* >>>> >>> >> Some of them may be obsolete or use the wrong and incorrect method to >>> implement something! >>> >> >> The issue with compatibility, both forwards and backwards is important. >> Also that presentation of resources is basically similar so users don't get >> confused. >> >> David can ensure neither. If he got into that the list would not get >> updated. Too much work for one person. >> >> BUT, far better to have something imperfect working than an idea of >> something perfect that is not possible because of the work involved :-) You >> see my point? >> >> >>> By the way, this is one of the best places to find TW resources. >>> Thank you David for all your efforts! >>> >> >> >>> One more comment >>> It seems TW is growing day by day, what is missing is a good >>> documentation >>> >> >> Its a "moot point" (meaning its "maybe not so simple"). >> >> On the one hand some things ARE under-documented. A current example is >> how to apply non-global CSS styles, which recently changed quite radically. >> > > *Can you elaborate on the CSS radical change? I don't know what that > change was. * > >> >> On the other hand a lot IS documented but GETS LOST because there is NO >> method in the Google Groups to tag anything that would allow you to find it >> later. >> >> In other words, the Documentation issue, in many ways, is exactly the >> same as the Resources Issue that David has a given a clear solution to >> through TiddlyToolMap. >> >> If someone could do a TiddlyManualMap for docs. you'd see what I mean. >> >> Great questions. I enjoyed trying to answer them from my point of view. >> >> Best wishes >> Josiah >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2eace0a6-e41a-4ffc-a82a-4b83ea425c1a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
