Mat, on LEGO.

I think its a good analogy. Especially for ready-bits like plugins (already 
lego-like) that just plug-n-work. The plugin architecture of TW seems very 
robust. 

The LEGO analogy works quite well also for dealing with the "fragment 
model"--making wholes from bits. Each "brick" is non-definitive but combos 
of bricks eventually form original wholes.

Josiah

Mat wrote:
>
> ... compare TW to building with lego. I master TW pretty well so I say I 
> can build "anything" with TW analogously to how I can build "anything" with 
> lego. So is that actually constructing things? 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/685d5e6a-ca81-4aca-95a9-486a5fd82991%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to