Ciao Diego I saw Mark pointed you to thread that touches on Zettelkasten.
One of the things that is interesting about the approach is its one of few areas of common computing that publicly engages with "theories of knowledge" and how implementation of them matters. Its much more explicit than much discussion. Truth is that different "models of knowledge" (how the brain works to create associative meanings) matter to the development of solutions. TiddlyWiki is particularly interesting is that the "model of knowledge" behind it is very flexible. It can well support Zettelkasten approaches. In some ways, if someone were interested to explore that fully, they might be able to develop a "Zettelkasten Plus" I think. Luhrman's original thinking on the subject is still very useful, even though he did his system all on paper cards. Particularly he was interested in SEMANTIC relationships. Even now computer science has some difficulty saying precisely enough what those are. Just thoughts Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/aebad9b6-e31b-45ab-9506-9a91aa32d60c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
