On Sunday, 2 September 2018 17:48:29 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: > > So the actual discovery was done by the "wetware" in his head, not the > "paperware" of the cards. >
Right. I think that is a very important point. There is no way he could have got that right on some quick cross-ref idea with stubborn paper. Rather it was a live system in mind that he generated a sophisticated concrete, physical crystallisation of. Its still a bit of a mystery how he did that so well at such scale. > For us, TW has at least 3 major ways of linking information (Tags, fields, > links) which should make review and discovery easier than ever. However, > there's always that temptation, once data has been captured, to not go back > and review. > I agree. I do think flex on the "after capture" review process is maybe an area where some explicit review aids might be made? --Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/816f730e-845e-4fbb-854c-05df97db295e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
