Mark S. wrote: > > From a mechanical perspective, I find too much in TW requires the mouse in > order to function. Ideally, your fingers would never have to leave the > keyboard, interrupting the train of thought that would lead to the next > Great Ankporkian novel. >
Of course I want to write The Library of Babel. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Library_of_Babel> Recent Keyboard work by BTC is very good. I'm wondering about what an auto spell-checking, word-counting, keyboard-driven, fully edit-driven (i.e. like BTC's pre-transclusion placeholder thing), fuzzy-searching, TW thingamy might look like, optimised for screen use on edit ... plus contraction and expansion gadgets (like Stretch-text) and inline footies... plus??? Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/92e0df32-8be8-4dda-9da0-ee7c8b7e6e9e%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
