Haha Josiah, I couldn't resist the all caps joke! But you didn't specify whether you would like to be an editor. Would you like to do that?
I am not retiring or backing off from helping with the official version, which will stay where it is. Nothing has changed in that regard. I merely copied that data and created a personal version just in case the editors make significant changes to my categories. My personal version will be for me and with my way of categorizing. Also, I don't plan to attempt to keep mine current. I will basically add stuff I think I might use. The official version will continue to be the main thing, even for me. Doing it in Dynalist was easier for copying, pasting and reordering during the initial process. Now that the toolmap only has small edits, Dynalist isn't so necessary. But since it is already in place, changing the format isn't so necessary, either. Set me up a collaborative TW and add the present material, and I will be happy to put the Dynalist version to pasture! Blessings, Dave On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 11:10:00 AM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Dear Dave > > I promise NOT to SHOUT on your stuff. > > I have a few comments (I also read the other thread where mr JR > commented)... > > 1 -- I do *not* think its a good idea to fork that list into a private > version and another version. Better keep it as one. Far better you remain > Master till other routes get properly moving. > > 2 -- My guess is you need most a few "watchful eyes" to notify on new > things. > > FWIW my own feeling is, longer term, to take your incredible work on > actually listing so much (its the most comprehensive ever done) and use it > to help generate a TW based system that is more sharable. > > I know from previous correspondence we had that the OPML export is > potentially something that a good programmer could digest into a TW. > > From my point of view a TW clone of your Dynalist could be very good. > Dynalist layout is excellent for its job. > > Just thoughts > Josiah > > David Gifford wrote: >> >> Based on a discussion in a recent thread, I am offering to authorize up >> to three volunteers to be able to edit that portion of my Dynalist account. >> This will allow it to grow more rapidly and meet more needs. >> >> They should be people who are on this forum regularly, who could spot new >> items and add them. >> They should be people who can write the entries in concise, non-technical >> language, and people who are fairly good at categorizing / cataloguing. >> They should preferably be people who have been around this forum and the >> TW community for at least a year or more. >> >> I have copied and pasted the current Dynalist entries to a separate >> section of my Dynalist account, and will manage that for my needs. But I >> will be glad to continue to add to the public toolmap, too, when people >> email me with submissions. >> >> If the volunteers decide together to add, combine or rename categories, I >> will not object. I will leave it to them to organize it as they see fit. If >> they write in ALL CAPS, however, I may have something to say about that. >> :-) you know who you are! :-) >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/772b3918-7963-4ba6-97b3-e17daf57290f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
