Thanks! Rather than create a separate category, I renamed the web publishing category to "Publishing and hosting TiddlyWikis on the web / on servers" and added Bob and TiddlyServer. Node.js has its own category.
Blessings On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:51:35 PM UTC-6, Mark S. wrote: > > I've run couple tests on Bob in the past week. > > IMO, I would put it, node.js, and tiddlyserver (which I just realized > isn't there yet) under a new category "Networked TiddlyWiki" (or maybe > "Servers"). Then any BOB-only plugins could go below the BOB entry. > > -- Mark > > On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 4:33:05 PM UTC-7, David Gifford wrote: >> >> Hi all >> >> I am not up to speed on Bob. Some tell me it has a significant learning >> curve, something I don't have time or energy for right now. >> >> So my questions are: >> >> 1. What category or categories should it be included under in the >> TiddlyWiki toolmap (https://dynalist.io/d/zUP-nIWu2FFoXH-oM7L7d9DM)? >> >> 2. Should it also be its own category? That is, is Bob something that >> could spawn Bob-specific plugins, extentions, tools, etc that should be >> counted as a separate category or ecosystem? >> >> Thanks and blessings, >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/65afabf9-9341-42b1-858d-7dfab0fd9847%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
