Boaz,

Timimi is Great, Even better than tiddlyfox because you do not need to 
click on the cat.

We have well and truly passed the "FireFox apocalypse" and it spawned 
substantial innovation. The save and serve tiddlywiki solutions are 
maturing and its slowly becoming easier to choose between options. I 
recommend you look at TiddlyServer as once you set the settings.json you 
can browse TiddlyWikis files and folder installs in the browser, and  Bob 
(Single Executable) for multi-access multi-user folder based wikis.

Regards
Tony




On Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 2:22:23 AM UTC+11, Boaz Nash wrote:
>
> Thanks Josiah, I will see if I can install Timimi!
>
> On Monday, November 5, 2018 at 8:11:07 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>>
>> This thread is a marker for what users need. It has had over FOUR 
>> THOUSAND views!
>>
>> Mark S. gave good solutions. There are others. IMO timimi is good for 
>> several platforms, including OSX, https://github.com/ibnishak/Timimi.
>>
>> It saves in the seamless way TiddlyFox did.
>>
>> Josiah
>>
>> On Monday, 5 November 2018 14:44:50 UTC+1, Boaz Nash wrote:
>>>
>>> Just found this thread and thought I'd try to get involved with 
>>> TiddlyWiki again.  This issue with TiddlyFox really killed me with 
>>> TiddlyWiki.  I still use Firefox as my default browser, so its annoying to 
>>> have to switch to a different browser just for TW.  Also, I have TW files 
>>> all over the place, named due to their subject and in many different 
>>> folders.  So far, I have not been able to relocate these to a single 
>>> location, and I don't really want to do that.  I also have some simple HTML 
>>> files that link to my TW files in their present locations.  In order to 
>>> move my TW files, I'd have to rewrite the links for all these HTML files.
>>> I invested heavily in the approach allowed by TiddlyFox, and now it 
>>> doesn't work anymore.  Its been almost a year, and I still try to use TW, 
>>> but its not convenient.  
>>> When I really want to edit my TiddlyWiki files, I use TiddlyDesktop, but 
>>> it feels a lot less convenient than using it from FireFox.  
>>> I will try to make another attempt to find a new approach.  I guess it 
>>> will involve throwing away a lot of files or some kind of major 
>>> reorganization.
>>> Thanks for suggestions.  I don't mean to just gripe.  I got a lot of 
>>> benefit out of TiddlyWiki.  But for the last year it hasn't worked for me 
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> On Saturday, October 28, 2017 at 3:33:51 AM UTC-6, Norm Davis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Firefox and Tiddly have long been great companions, but Firefox is 
>>>> going sideways and the old Firefox Tiddly extension for saving in the new 
>>>> Firefox 57 doesn't work.  Will there be anyone working on a rewrite or a 
>>>> new extension?  Hope so!  Thanks for any helpful info.  
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2149f699-bfe2-48c2-8d11-29a493ece0bb%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to