Maybe you are right. I have a bunch of domains. I do feel I'm being punished for a non-existent crime :-).
On Thursday, 6 December 2018 18:21:17 UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: > > I wonder if gmail doesn't completely trust your email domain? > > -- Mark > > On Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 9:18:01 AM UTC-8, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Greg, much, much appreciated. Its now clearer I get bounced on email when >> I initiate an post. Otherwise OK. It somewhat bizarre :-). >> >> Thank you >> J. >> >> On Thursday, 6 December 2018 18:13:45 UTC+1, Greg Davis wrote: >>> >>> Josiah, >>> I did not get your original message on security. I'm using Gmail, >>> checked SPAM and TRASH and it was not in either. These are your messages, >>> as of 11:35am this morning, that I had received: >>> >>> [tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki at the local Community College 6:38am >>> >>> [tw5] Re: I love TiddlyWiki because... 7:17am >>> >>> [tw5] Re: Favicon is not displayed 9:36am >>> >>> [tw5] Re: [I'd like to TALK] ... About Security 9:43am >>> >>> On Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 9:43:04 AM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>>> >>>> For email users of this list ... I just wrote a post ... Could one of >>>> you let me know if you got this message ... >>>> >>>> (Web users of the group can ignore this post) >>>> >>>> J. >>>> >>>> @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm getting very interested in TW as a potentially secure way to chat, >>>>> and publish material that is ONLY for selected users/participants. >>>>> >>>>> Part of the background is that its becoming clearer that large online >>>>> services are NOT, ultimately, able to secure conversation. I spent the >>>>> last >>>>> two days sorting out the aftermath for me of the Quora meltdown ... >>>>> https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2018/12/04/quora-hacked-what-happened-what-data-was-stolen-and-what-do-100-million-users-need-to-do-next/ >>>>> >>>>> The problem is those types of system are owned and run at huge scale >>>>> by far off companies and you don't know what they are doing. In fact THEY >>>>> often don't know what they are doing till its too late. This just is the >>>>> latest of a long line of serious cloud hacks. I basically don't trust >>>>> them >>>>> now. The hassle re-setting everything after an attack is both a PITA and >>>>> very worrying. Identity theft can be a very complicated thing to sort out. >>>>> >>>>> TW seems interesting if you can add *two step verification*. >>>>> >>>>> Practically I'm very interested in being able to run a TW online just >>>>> for conversation with ONE person ... i.e. One Wiki Per Converser. In this >>>>> way we can chat AND in teaching I can show all but only what is needed. >>>>> This is appropriate for how I work, which is all one-on-one. More >>>>> collectivist security models interest me too, but the simple >>>>> person-to-person is a specific interest. And I think it may be simpler to >>>>> establish really robustly? >>>>> >>>>> This is just one set of thoughts. My main concern is: can TW be >>>>> maximally secure? I think, if it could be demonstrably so on-line it >>>>> could >>>>> be a USP for it. >>>>> >>>>> Any comments welcomed ... >>>>> >>>>> These are just early thoughts >>>>> Josiah >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b57de9a0-d77c-40d6-bc3d-99e811c6e302%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
