You could use a gmail account to make your initial posts. -- Mark
On Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 9:28:27 AM UTC-8, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Maybe you are right. I have a bunch of domains. I do feel I'm being > punished for a non-existent crime :-). > > On Thursday, 6 December 2018 18:21:17 UTC+1, Mark S. wrote: >> >> I wonder if gmail doesn't completely trust your email domain? >> >> -- Mark >> >> On Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 9:18:01 AM UTC-8, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>> >>> Greg, much, much appreciated. Its now clearer I get bounced on email >>> when I initiate an post. Otherwise OK. It somewhat bizarre :-). >>> >>> Thank you >>> J. >>> >>> On Thursday, 6 December 2018 18:13:45 UTC+1, Greg Davis wrote: >>>> >>>> Josiah, >>>> I did not get your original message on security. I'm using Gmail, >>>> checked SPAM and TRASH and it was not in either. These are your messages, >>>> as of 11:35am this morning, that I had received: >>>> >>>> [tw5] Re: TiddlyWiki at the local Community College 6:38am >>>> >>>> [tw5] Re: I love TiddlyWiki because... 7:17am >>>> >>>> [tw5] Re: Favicon is not displayed 9:36am >>>> >>>> [tw5] Re: [I'd like to TALK] ... About Security 9:43am >>>> >>>> On Thursday, December 6, 2018 at 9:43:04 AM UTC-5, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>> For email users of this list ... I just wrote a post ... Could one of >>>>> you let me know if you got this message ... >>>>> >>>>> (Web users of the group can ignore this post) >>>>> >>>>> J. >>>>> >>>>> @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm getting very interested in TW as a potentially secure way to >>>>>> chat, and publish material that is ONLY for selected users/participants. >>>>>> >>>>>> Part of the background is that its becoming clearer that large online >>>>>> services are NOT, ultimately, able to secure conversation. I spent the >>>>>> last >>>>>> two days sorting out the aftermath for me of the Quora meltdown ... >>>>>> https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2018/12/04/quora-hacked-what-happened-what-data-was-stolen-and-what-do-100-million-users-need-to-do-next/ >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem is those types of system are owned and run at huge scale >>>>>> by far off companies and you don't know what they are doing. In fact >>>>>> THEY >>>>>> often don't know what they are doing till its too late. This just is the >>>>>> latest of a long line of serious cloud hacks. I basically don't trust >>>>>> them >>>>>> now. The hassle re-setting everything after an attack is both a PITA and >>>>>> very worrying. Identity theft can be a very complicated thing to sort >>>>>> out. >>>>>> >>>>>> TW seems interesting if you can add *two step verification*. >>>>>> >>>>>> Practically I'm very interested in being able to run a TW online just >>>>>> for conversation with ONE person ... i.e. One Wiki Per Converser. In >>>>>> this >>>>>> way we can chat AND in teaching I can show all but only what is needed. >>>>>> This is appropriate for how I work, which is all one-on-one. More >>>>>> collectivist security models interest me too, but the simple >>>>>> person-to-person is a specific interest. And I think it may be simpler >>>>>> to >>>>>> establish really robustly? >>>>>> >>>>>> This is just one set of thoughts. My main concern is: can TW be >>>>>> maximally secure? I think, if it could be demonstrably so on-line it >>>>>> could >>>>>> be a USP for it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any comments welcomed ... >>>>>> >>>>>> These are just early thoughts >>>>>> Josiah >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/34d7d5d0-5e42-46a6-a0d4-36d8db9d869f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
