TonyM wrote: > > ... static sites which I believe are the key to improving tiddlywiki > appearence in search results. >
It would be far better to put effort into getting JS rich TW "sites" (single page) better indexed. The idea you make a TW and then have to make another another "static" version SUCKS. Google can obviously traverse pages with JS otherwise most of the net would not be indexed. There is likely a way we are missing. I think we need better understanding of G. indexing. Just my guess Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/9e1033c5-08eb-4c53-91dc-df7d29a91f80%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
