Hi Tony! Thank you! Yes, it would make life much easier! --Mohammad
On Saturday, February 23, 2019 at 1:23:42 AM UTC+3:30, TonyM wrote: > > Mohammad, > > I think Jeremy is suggesting storing the macro output in a variable as a > future feature. This is a bit like allowing us to pipe the output of one > macro into another. > > I think this would be helpful, and would make some solutions much easier > to code. > > I would love to find a way to store a variable in a more permanent form > without a button. Or store it in a field or text reference. Even if the > value must be reevaluated on render. > > Regards > Tony > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/44780c48-8bf1-4665-a4de-ea40fff7ae73%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
