Okay! I am achanging the interface and will upload a new update within an hour.
--Mohammad On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at 5:29:59 PM UTC+3:30, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > M, > > In particular, *multi-line mode* is excellent! Great news! > > It allows step by step changes. > > J. > > On Wednesday, 6 March 2019 14:52:51 UTC+1, Mohammad wrote: >> >> Many Thanks Josiah! >> >> I would appreciate your time teaching us how to use regexp in Tiddlywiki >> and specially here with SNR2. >> For the issue you mentioned, I could not find any solution and Jeremy >> comments did not help me to understand what I should do! >> >> By the way, I thought it is better to choose the flag from interface, so >> I am adding >> >> i: ignore case >> g: find all (global match) >> \b: whole words >> m: multi line mode >> >> So, user can select one or a mixed of them (of course \b is something >> separate here!) >> >> I am not sure if m is useful here, but i and g are used frequently! >> >> --Mohammad >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, March 6, 2019 at 5:10:19 PM UTC+3:30, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>> >>> Mohammad & all interested >>> >>> I have done a lot of testing of "s-n-r2". It is very good! >>> >>> >>> *DIFFERENCES FROM NORMAL REGEX* >>> >>> It differs from normal regular expressions in that TiddlyWiki needs to >>> guard itself from eating itself. >>> >>> >>> >>> *It does this by needing the regex to be wrapped in Quote Marks*. >>> >>> The type of quote marks differ according to the use-case. >>> >>> IF a tiddler only contains * ' * then wrapping in * " * will work. And >>> vice-versa. >>> >>> >>> IF a tiddler contains both * ' * and * " * quotes then the match >>> string is easiest enabled by wrapping it: * """regex""" *. >>> >>> >>> >>> *LIMITS* >>> >>> 1 - I have found NO WAY to safely make changes in a tiddler that >>> contains the string * """ *. Those 3 double quotes are likely >>> protecting TW from itself but the regex can't currently cope with them. >>> >>> >>> >>> *That rules out safe s-n-r via regex in many macros.* >>> >>> >>> >>> 2 - SUBSTITUTION. Mohammad and I found out that there is currently no >>> easy way to get Control Codes into output replaces. This is problematic as, >>> for instance, we need to replace * <pre> * with * \n```\n *. BUT in >>> replace the "\n" is only treated as a literal. >>> >>> >>> Best wishes >>> Josiah >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/988a8b64-5e14-4caa-b4f1-b60e689eb374%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
