@Tony

While what you write is, of course, true, I think it is more fair to not go 
beyond the native tools provided by TW when describing what WikiText is. 
Any computer language can be anti-abstracted down to machine code but the 
point (or at least my point) is to stay in the layer we're at.

That said, maybe TW makes it unusually easy to integrate and break out of 
the immediate layer one is in compared to other "languages". I'm not 
qualified to tell.

...but on the other hand, if one insists on bringing up JS+HTML+CSS then 
what TW allows is clearly more limited since TW implements restrictions on 
what to do, especially with JS.

<:-)
 

>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1719ade9-3e13-4c78-a875-8b49f9f265b9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to