Folks, Jeremy and Jed specifically. When I mentioned Progressive WebAps, I think you took me too literally. My point is there is an expectation building and tiddlywiki is already well setup to respond to these expectations. Here are the key functionalities and I would find it hard to imaging you think any of these are not wotrhy aims.
- *Progressive* — Works for every user, regardless of browser choice, using progressive enhancement <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_enhancement> principles. - *Responsive* — Fits any form factor: desktop, mobile, tablet, or forms yet to emerge. - *Connectivity independent* — Service workers *are one way but we do not need them do we?* allow offline uses, or on low quality networks. - *App-like* — Feels like an app to the user with app-style interactions and navigation. - *Fresh* — Always up-to-date (this is a designers choice) and less importiant when we do not use a server backend. - *Safe* — Served via HTTPS <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTPS> to prevent snooping and ensure content hasn't been tampered with. - *Discoverable* — Identifiable as an “application” by manifest.json[13] <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_web_applications#cite_note-w3cmanifest-13> and service worker registration, and discoverable by search engines. - *Re-engageable* — Ability to use push notifications <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_technology> to maintain engagement with the user. - *Installable* — Provides homescreen icons without the use of an App Store. - *Linkable* — Can easily be shared via a URL, and does not require complex installation. On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 6:04:40 AM UTC+10, Mohammad wrote: > > Thank you all for your time and useful points! > It seems the conclusion by now and is > > Sell your time, it is hard if not impossible to sell TW based apps. > > > Best > Mohammad > > > On Saturday, July 6, 2019 at 7:00:35 AM UTC-7, passingby wrote: >> >> Out of the many plus points of tiddlywiki, I want to point out these: >> >> 1. Subscription based software: Everything today has become greedier than >> before. Every software out there is subscription based now. If I have to >> use MS Office I pay around a CAD 100 and this when I am not even using it >> for business. >> 2. Data with corporations: One not only buys the service but hands over >> the data >> >> Now there is a Tiddlywiki developer. You pay him, he hacks out a solution >> for you. One time fee. You keep the app. If you wish you can hack it >> yourself but if you want a professional job you pay a one time fee to a >> developer. >> >> There should be a market for this in small business sector. Especially in >> context of monthly subscriptions which a small business takes on. >> >> >> On Thursday, July 4, 2019 at 4:36:43 AM UTC-7, Mohammad wrote: >>> >>> >>> 1. Do you think Tiddlywiki is enough mature to create applications >>> (Apps) based on it for commercial use cases? >>> 2. Do you think it is possible to sell such applications for >>> commercial use cases (not for academic or individuals)? >>> >>> >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/2c0f975c-288a-4f80-b68a-df3dcfb1073a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
