Repeat for those on email

On Tuesday, 9 July 2019 22:50:40 UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> This a difficult logical problem, not just in TW, but in much sortware.
>
> Bear with me.
>
> An issue is we use HTML lists for representation of structural hierarchy.
>
> We go good at nesting them and delving through complex nested hierachy 
> (e.g. bimlas' excellent recent work).
>
> But there is still a probem.
>
> The problem is combining equality with hierachy.
>
> To try make this clearer. Its easy in TW to, through tagging, accurately 
> depict ...
>
> .father
>  .son
>   .son's daughter
>
> but very difficult to depict
>
> .father + .mother
>    .son + .wife
>      .daughter
>
> I'm not sure you may even understand what I'm talking about.
>
> ONE this is very clear to me is that HTML lists can only depict SINGULAR 
> HIERARCHY. It can branch but it can't conjoin. That is a serious limitation 
> on the depiction of actual things.
>
> Like every net thing TW is limited by what is expressed in HTML. But I 
> think its an interesting issue. Some limitations, I think, in TW, arise 
> directly out of the limits of HTML lists.
>
> Thoughts
> Josiah
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/fa8ad5f5-89c2-4945-9bdb-9a3dcdd2d12d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to