It could just post a warning at the end of the menu if key settings are missing. And the various routines refuse to run (with a message) if the downloads or other essential settings are missing.
My sense is that anyone who is challenged by a simple ini file (pre-filled with sample data) won't be helped much by a wizard or step-by-step process ... or am I overly pessimistic? Thanks! On Monday, July 29, 2019 at 12:17:24 PM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > On Monday, 29 July 2019 21:07:33 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, July 29, 2019 at 11:47:19 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>> >>> >>> But without a settings editor or method to make an .ini and instructions >>> on how to I don't think it will be a happy experience trying to use it :-(. >>> Maybe I'm wrong? >>> >>> >> The settings are easier to read and set than for Bob or TiddlyServer. >> > > Agree. But that is not exactly that I meant :-). Its that Polly doesn't > really function at all without settings defined (I guess you could stare at > the menu :). But if you try option A without having defined them you'll get > swamped in Errorase. :-) > > >> So at least *some *people should be OK with it. But maybe the people >> you're thinking of are >> different than the people I'm thinking of. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/31441943-0e90-4d08-8e52-fc2d7317cc8d%40googlegroups.com.
