I'm working on the new timestamp and subdirectories routines. I think adding zips to a single archive would be inadvisable since as it increases in size it will take longer and longer for the backup to process. Eventually it will probably crash.
An ambitious enhancement would be to delete all but the last x number of backups. Of course, it's always a little worrying to be deleting things. Thanks! On Friday, July 26, 2019 at 11:16:48 PM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: > > Mark S. wrote: >> >> At some point, if we can figure how to do it, it would make more sense to >> stamp them with the original date stamp, since that's >> what you're going to be looking for if you have to do a >> restore-from-backup. >> > > Okay. Agreed. > > I just wanted to addionally mention that I noticed in tests that if you > have more than a couple of wiki the backups and zip-archive listing get > very noisy. > > Might it be better to do ...??? > > ...\backupdir\wikiname-ext\wikiname-datestamp.ext > > ... so each wiki has its own sub-dir in backups? > > Same with zips? > > Q: Do you know if the PowerShell zip system supports incremental adds to > an archive? > If possible, what I'm thinking of, is to have one zip file per wiki, that > date-stamped wiki get added to? > > Thoughts? > > TT > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b8f3e105-1ee7-4c00-999c-2c8fc84ac41d%40googlegroups.com.
