Ciao Tony My query is about levels of automation.
I fundamentally agree that PMario's and Riz's plugin systems are excellent. I simply wondering about RESTORE PROCESS. Whether they can be automated in some way to not just save, but restore? *It is a valid thought.* The originating observation was that TW has NO native undo, though Mohammad's recent Trash Bin is a real step towards less worry. I am not expecting anyone to solve the issue. Merely noting it exists and its a real limit in TW. TT On Saturday, 17 August 2019 18:44:24 UTC+2, TonyM wrote: > > Josiah, > > I think my experience now with tiddlywiki is approaching 10 years. > Starting with twc and prior to the tiddlywiki apocalypse, which never came > like most apocalypse dont, I had a few saving or corrupt changes > disappointments but the community response to the browser challenges have > delivered far more than I can imagine. My own practices now garentee > recovery of anything I want, at a tiddler level, bunch of tiddlers or whole > wiki level. > > Tw reciver, timimi and tiddlyserver all have reliable backups to mention a > few. I am not so sure on folder based wikis. Maintaining automatic save > performs well. > > I think what you are suggesting is here but a plugin and better ui is all > we need. One proposal I think would help is to simplify filtering tiddlers > from the import mechanisium. > > There are a few problems that can only be fixed with a direct edit of the > wiki file, but good practices can protect you from that. > > What do you perceive to be the gap? > > regards > Tony > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8aa9477a-84d7-4d26-bb6e-fafa6fb37850%40googlegroups.com.
