On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 7:25:33 AM UTC-5, PMario wrote:
>
> On Monday, August 19, 2019 at 4:50:11 PM UTC+2, coda coder wrote:
> ...
>
>> So, in my view...
>>
>> A "good fragment" is, *generally speaking,* something that "belongs" in
>> a field.
>>
>
> I do like the quotes around your "belongs"!
>
Yep. ;)
> IMO with TW5 this is a technical reason and it shouldn't be that way. ...
> It should be much more user friendly.
>
>
Agreed. I too think we lost something when TWC's heading-sections didn't
make it into the TW5 model.
I do use custom tags to create a poor-man's version of sections within a
text - but individual addressability is not possible.
In my dreams, this would work:
{{tiddler-name[!!optional-field]]..section-name}}
And in markup...
\define-section my-section
Stuff and things
\end
Or, perhaps,
<tiddler-section name="my-section">
More stuff
</>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/05f1e061-1acb-4002-ac8d-042131d4b71e%40googlegroups.com.
