You know, you could already do something sort of like that with macros: \define show-macro(macro) <$reveal type="match" state=<<qualify "$macro$">> text="show">
<<$macro$>> </$reveal> <$button set=<<qualify "$macro$">> setTo="show">Show</$button> <$button set=<<qualify "$macro$">> setTo="hide">Hide</$button> \end \define GAN-010() !! The Great Anhk-Porkian Novel The waters of the Anhk River were flowing briskly that day. Which meant, for most of the neighborhood, that they could function as a form of moving sidewalk. Albeit, one you might be stuck to forever. \end \define GAN-020() !!! A Chat with DEATH But the flow of the river matched the slower, more leisurely flow of photons from the Desk World sun. The flight flowing slower, necessarily putting an upper limit on everyone's activities, per the Anne Stein's law of Relativity. To wit, if you were a relative of Anne Stein, the curvaceous bar-maid, then maybe you better make your order and hurry up with it. At the end of the bar sat a tall, lonely figure wearing a black shroud, a permanent grin, and a large toupee. \end <<show-macro "GAN-010">> <<show-macro "GAN-020">> If there was a way to find all the macros inside a tiddler, then you wouldn't need to individually invoke them. --Mark On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 9:56:57 AM UTC-7, coda coder wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 10:41:59 AM UTC-5, PMario wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 at 4:13:39 PM UTC+2, coda coder wrote: >> >> Hmmm, That's a similar thought as I posted in the thread: IDEA >> Multi-line Fields ... Possible implementation >> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/tiddlywiki/42_bWs-f2YY> >> >> > Ha! almost identical :) > > >> Defining prose text like this, would make it technically accessible. >> > > That's the key - addressability. > > >> ... But there wouldn't be the "beauty" of a continuous writing process. >> >> > Agreed. But I don't see a way around that. I guess something like @@ could > be used (or !headings again, which terminate at the next identical !heading > or end of field). > > But, to be clear, I was suggesting \define-section be used *inline*, not > at the start of the text like macros: > > Stuff and things > > \define-section my-section > More stuff > \end > > And more things > > > Then the transclusion previously mentioned digs them out (or they're > double-stored in data-fields for easier lookup/retrieval). > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f27352a5-44f3-4253-8524-eb2313d333ed%40googlegroups.com.
