Ciao Gloom
I have not forgotten this.
I note your comments about general blindness.
It may take me a while, but I'm trying to think through how to present a
manageable question to CSS pundits here so we can get better made ...
"Sight-Equipped-Palettes"
... in time.
IMO explicitly dealing with the issue of "sightedness" and promoting
solutions could increase uptake of TW.
Thoughts
TT
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 02:28:12 UTC+2, A Gloom wrote:
>
> >> Gloom, not Gloomy, wrote
>
> Gloomy works too, just don't called me Cheery : P
>
> I'll post separately about it as its an interesting issue.
>
>
> Do it-- the first step to start awareness, is to reveal the issue. Color
> blindness iirc is more common that what I suffer from-- general blindness,
> thoudh the white bachground issue I suffer from may be just as common--
> suffered by people that are losing their sight to diabeties.
>
> Here's tthe source I was referring to-- some of the question responses
> refer to scientific details on palettes of the most contrsting colors (as
> in colors with the most contast (seperation) between them-- good for color
> coding-- no mistaking the differences in colors)
>
>
> https://graphicdesign.stackexchange.com/questions/3682/where-can-i-find-a-large-palette-set-of-contrasting-colors-for-coloring-many-d
>
> this questions' answers bring up color blindeness and color coding
>
>
> https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/118033/best-series-of-colors-to-use-for-differentiating-series-in-publication-quality
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/68766438-f89c-4c39-9086-924926b67b52%40googlegroups.com.
