Mark, S. > All we have is regex. >
> It would be great to have some other tool for extracting actual DOM-like > structures the way you could with TW classic. But we don't have it. > Actually, the tool we have for regexp is also a bit lacking. There's no > tool for directly lifting desired target text. > I'd be interested in better documenting the regex operators TW has in the context of what JS regex can do. I strongly believe it needs referents, i.e. informed by what regex "match" AND "replace do" in standard JS, In raw form (pre-parser intervention) TW can, of course, do anything JS can, but that is not at the level where most are working. TT -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b3e3271e-52a9-489e-8b7a-8e4565bf35b5%40googlegroups.com.
