Thanks Tony! This way I can use directly the title and the description filed can be avoided.
Cheers Mohammad On Monday, August 26, 2019 at 8:06:55 AM UTC+4:30, TonyM wrote: > > Mohammad, > > This is becoming a very helpful resource. thanks for sharing your work, > > I noticed the test for leading caps in a title - I discovered a method on > this to capitalise only when needed, > > for example try this in a tiddler named tiddlername > <p style="text-transform: capitalize;"><<currentTiddler>></p> > > or in 5.1.20 (First to lowercase is a good pattern see > https://tiddlywiki.com/#titlecase%20Operator) > {{{ [{!!title}lowercase[]titlecase[]] }}} > > <$text text={{{ [{!!title}lowercase[]titlecase[]] }}}/> > > For example this can be used to capitalise a fieldname on display when you > can't store it capitalised > {{{ [fields[]lowercase[]titlecase[]] }}} > > I suppose what I am saying here is capitalisation is more a display > feature than a necessary naming standard. > > Regards > Tony > > On Monday, August 26, 2019 at 5:31:33 AM UTC+10, Mohammad wrote: >> >> See the latest update of documentation wiki in that most part of this >> thread has been documented >> >> rev: 0.5 >> url: http://tw-regexp.tiddlyspot.com/ >> >> --Mohammad >> >> On Sunday, August 25, 2019 at 11:34:11 PM UTC+4:30, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>> >>> Mark S. wrote: >>>> >>>> I think he means "02" literally. Usually IP numbers aren't padded, so >>>> not sure. >>>> >>>> It's the range 0-255 that's problematic. Here's what I have for the >>>> range: >>>> >>>> <option value="^(\b\d\b|\b\d\d\b|1\d\d|2[0-4]\d|25[0-5])">IP range >>>> 0-256</option> >>>> >>> >>> IF that means numbers 000 to 255 it looks doable. >>> >>> Hmm, I guess with an IP you could add the mandatory delimiter (usually >>>> ".") and repeat the group. But you would have to manually repeat the group >>>> at the end where the delimiter must not be. >>>> >>> >>> That is quite easy in regex as you can make it just *"\.?"*. Repeat is >>> easy, just put the dot first on repeats. >>> >>> And then there's zero padding. Most of the IP numbers I've seen are not >>>> zero-padded, but ... >>>> >>> >>> That is much more difficult in regex. So long as the system throws the >>> 0's away when not needed it may be okay? >>> >>> I think the first thing I would do is see what the internet says. >>>> >>>> A search for "regular expression ip address" immediately turns up a >>>> page from O'Reilly, with both a simple >>>> version and an accurate version for checking IP. As I expected, they're >>>> able to do a repeat on the structure 3 times, but >>>> have to do the last one by hand. They've figured out the 0 padding: >>>> >>>> ^(?:(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)\.){3}(?:25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)$ >>>> >>>> >>>> So ... no need to rebuild the wheel for most common use cases. Hmm, I >>>> wonder about IPv6 ? >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Ok, sorry for the stream-of-consciousness problem-working. >>>> >>> >>> Its interesting & useful! >>> >>> TT >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/87e4099a-1f1d-4936-ad3e-1d4cf7a661cb%40googlegroups.com.
