On Thursday, September 12, 2019 at 1:13:32 PM UTC+2, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> PMario wrote:
>>
>> I think, we should talk a little bit more about the specification and
>> then about the implementation.
>>
>
> I can't help technically.
>
But I can comment on how I could use it...
>
My usecase is a little bit different. ... I want to have "replay-ability".
Eg:
- I want to programmatically create several 10000s of tiddlers with some
text, tags, fields, aliases ...
- I want to use wikitext for this .. if possible
- I'm sure I can tiddlywiki --build it on the command line
- Then I want to open a list eg: [tag[tag001]] where 001 is a random
number but the tag exists
- I want to measure the time, that is needed.
- Not JS time, but UX time
That's cool for me. I can publish the measurements. ... BUT nobody can
validate my measurements, because it's hard to reliably "replay" it.
So I'd like to have predictable random number generators here. ... Several
of them.
If I can give you the "seed-values" or even better: 1 seed value, you can
reliably replay it.
have fun!
mario
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/790211e2-e1ee-4845-8709-c3cde417ac77%40googlegroups.com.
