TW-Scripts has 4000+ tiddlers including all shadow tiddlers. I am on 5.1.21, Firefox 69, Win 10
I see noticeable response time comparing to empty.html --Mohammad On Friday, September 20, 2019 at 8:49:37 AM UTC+4:30, Mark S. wrote: > > My project may have been over ambitious. But I thought there were going to > be some > improvements in 5.1.20+ that would allow for larger TW files. I currently > have a TW file > with about 36,000 short dictionary definitions. Each tiddler consists only > of a title > and a field, EN, with usually only 3 or four words in it. The overall size > is only 10 megs. > > Overall, the performance is impracticably slow. Ten seconds to open a > tiddler. 20 seconds or more > to do a simple search box search. As much as 25 seconds or more to close > out tiddlers that > need to render a custom search. In most cases, you have to type blind > because the > keystroke refresh is also incredibly slow. > > I'm wondering if the performance improvements actually made it into the > core, or if > my expectations were too high. Actually, the performance noticeably > declined > after the first 12,000 entries. > > At the moment it seems like I need to start over, using a data dictionary > instead of > tiddlers for storage. > > Firefox, Windows 7, TW 5.1.21 > > Thanks! > Mark > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/89274b35-487f-47d4-b953-af494a66ad4d%40googlegroups.com.
