Mario I understand where you are coming from. There is a reasonable argument to keep this open in the standard distribution to keep things obvious yet tiddlywiki already hides things only experts can find and at other times is inconsistent
Tiddlywiki standard distribution has decided to hide system tiddlers and tags from the standard search. This helps keep things cleaner for users. This hidding is about clarity not secrecy. It has also chosen to hide the tags field and replace it with a special dialogue, hiding other fields as well. Yet Tiddlywiki standard distribution has chosen not to hide system tags both on the tag bar or in edit mode. Should this not be an option for clarity not secrecy? Perhaps the best of both worlds is to hide system tags behind a more checkbox or an option to do so. This is all the more important since system tags are often a lot longer than standard tags. I try to avoid expecting the user to use system tiddlers and prefer to give them easy "semantic" word based tags. I would also like to hide fields the user needs a more advanced field selector (which I provide in the view template) to set rather than edit directly. I only recently worked out how to do this. I then add a design mode that unhides these fields with a click. Food for thought? Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/eea826aa-77b9-495f-a01e-a8da7235b30e%40googlegroups.com.
