TonyM Looks very good.
Do you know that this design can also be created with github pages and Jekyll? And github hosts it. It's all integrated. Here a Jekyll Showroom: especially the first: Spotify for Developer (Documentation) <https://jekyllrb.com/showcase/> Regards Cd.K On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 5:28:23 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: > > Cd K > > Keep up the research. I am however a Strong believer in a meta community > site that can oversee whatever content and methods we use. Past Personal > and forum posts suggests GitHub can be a barrier to interaction, however > since we are committed for the core repository we should embrace it. How > much we embrace it is a living question. > > I have a site as a demonstration I am still working on that captures my > ideas of what can be in a community and how to go about it. I can see > embedding github, tiddlywiki sites and resources and even Discourse are > reasonably easy thing to achieve. > > However for long term viability I believe it should be customised to > address the management of what I call tiddlywiki objects, wiks, editions, > plugins, macros, servers, themes etc... as I result I am exploring the use > of custom post types and additional metadata. This would allow a Wiki > edition to reference the plugins it contains, and a plugin can reference > the editions its used in etc... > > Have a look to see some of my ideas reflected in the site itself. > > http://www.colabteam.net/tiddlywiki/ > > Regards > Tony > > > On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 12:53:37 PM UTC+10, Cd.K wrote: >> >> Hi TonyM >> >> I'm already testing my GitHub idea. >> >> GitHub is a serious alternative. >> >> *Take a look at this: * >> ProBot Framework to automate and improve your github workflow >> <https://github.com/probot/probot> >> >> >> It would also be possible to create the posts (issues) directly with >> tiddlers from the user's TiddlyWikis. >> >> >> >> Regards >> Cd.K >> >> >> On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 12:22:19 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: >>> >>> Some quick points >>> >>> Any new solution starts with 1 user and the numbers must build. >>> >>> If numbers using a new system do not grow then perhaps its not Google >>> groups fault but the new system. This is only true if people Actualy give >>> the new solution a fair try. 20+ people joined hammer but only 3 sent one >>> or more messages. >>> >>> We can use Google groups and chew gum. I keep an eye on disquis even now. >>> >>> Discourse looks promising but only having docker hosting is a >>> disadvantage and I am still not sure its everyday use is effective. >>> >>> I will post another interpretation of our circumstances soon. >>> >>> Regards >>> Tony >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a649c945-81be-41ab-875c-c7cc2b656ec3%40googlegroups.com.
