Cd K I know WordPress very well, I am not sure how easy it would be to use theses others.
Regards Tony On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 2:26:40 PM UTC+10, Cd.K wrote: > > TonyM > > Looks very good. > > Do you know that this design can also be created with github pages and > Jekyll? And github hosts it. It's all integrated. > > Here a Jekyll Showroom: > especially the first: Spotify for Developer (structured Documentation) > <https://jekyllrb.com/showcase/> > > Regards > Cd.K > > > > > On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 5:28:23 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: >> >> Cd K >> >> Keep up the research. I am however a Strong believer in a meta community >> site that can oversee whatever content and methods we use. Past Personal >> and forum posts suggests GitHub can be a barrier to interaction, however >> since we are committed for the core repository we should embrace it. How >> much we embrace it is a living question. >> >> I have a site as a demonstration I am still working on that captures my >> ideas of what can be in a community and how to go about it. I can see >> embedding github, tiddlywiki sites and resources and even Discourse are >> reasonably easy thing to achieve. >> >> However for long term viability I believe it should be customised to >> address the management of what I call tiddlywiki objects, wiks, editions, >> plugins, macros, servers, themes etc... as I result I am exploring the use >> of custom post types and additional metadata. This would allow a Wiki >> edition to reference the plugins it contains, and a plugin can reference >> the editions its used in etc... >> >> Have a look to see some of my ideas reflected in the site itself. >> >> http://www.colabteam.net/tiddlywiki/ >> >> Regards >> Tony >> >> >> On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 12:53:37 PM UTC+10, Cd.K wrote: >>> >>> Hi TonyM >>> >>> I'm already testing my GitHub idea. >>> >>> GitHub is a serious alternative. >>> >>> *Take a look at this: * >>> ProBot Framework to automate and improve your github workflow >>> <https://github.com/probot/probot> >>> >>> >>> It would also be possible to create the posts (issues) directly with >>> tiddlers from the user's TiddlyWikis. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Cd.K >>> >>> >>> On Friday, October 4, 2019 at 12:22:19 AM UTC+2, TonyM wrote: >>>> >>>> Some quick points >>>> >>>> Any new solution starts with 1 user and the numbers must build. >>>> >>>> If numbers using a new system do not grow then perhaps its not Google >>>> groups fault but the new system. This is only true if people Actualy give >>>> the new solution a fair try. 20+ people joined hammer but only 3 sent one >>>> or more messages. >>>> >>>> We can use Google groups and chew gum. I keep an eye on disquis even >>>> now. >>>> >>>> Discourse looks promising but only having docker hosting is a >>>> disadvantage and I am still not sure its everyday use is effective. >>>> >>>> I will post another interpretation of our circumstances soon. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Tony >>>> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/8891c88f-d739-4ff2-8b5f-954cd3e45d62%40googlegroups.com.
