> The problem here is that many functions (whether core or third party) > access tiddler properties directly rather than through a well-defined > interface, which means we can't intercept that access.
Actually. we might. While reading an article explaining how accessors are mostly unnecessary in Python*, I realized that JavaScript is equally flexible. So perhaps we could redefine the Tiddler class to use a function instead of accessing properties directly. I'm not entirely convinced yet that this is possible - not only because we actually need asynchronous access - but wanted to throw it out there, just in case... -- F. * http://grahamweekly.blogspot.com/2009/01/bad-python.html --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
