On Mar 3, 5:02 pm, FND <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Those plans have indeed been dropped.
> You're right that we should have posted an update in that previous
> thread - and we'd be happy to elaborate on the reasons there.
> To be fair though, we never got much of a response to those proposals,
> so there didn't seem to be much interest in the issue.
I'd like to point out that a lack of response and a lack of interest
are two completely different things. A lack of dissent is in fact an
approval of the proposal and as such it was entirely natural to expect
the lack of any further updates to mean those changes would be
implemented. Martin has been kind enough to explain the reasons behind
reverting that change, so no harm done. (Thanks again Martin)
> > In Steps 2 & 3 of the jQuery integration process that you describe,
> > it seems like a careful review of the entire TW code would be needed
> > to affect a proper re-factoring with jQuery in mind. What if any plans
> > have been made for this? Do you have some kind of mechanism in mind to
> > facilitate this?
>
> That's definitely something we're thinking about, and of course we'd
> welcome any help and/or expertise in that process!
> While we have to release 2.5.0 first, we'll start a thread about this
> issue soon.
Terrific, I'll be looking forward to it.
Cheers,
Saq
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
