Cheers, thanks for that Eric. I'd rather wait a few days for
TiddlyWiki 2.5 and use $(".viewer") though. ;)

Saq

On Mar 4, 11:07 pm, Eric Shulman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It's something I begrudgingly accepted when writing the code as there was no
> > easy way to find the viewer div, so it looks for a direct child of the
> > tiddler div.
>
> Try this:
>
> function getViewer(place) {
>    var here=story.findContainingTiddler(place);
>    if (!here) return null;
>    var divs=here.getElementsByTagName('div');
>    for (var i=0; i<divs.length && !hasClass(divs[i],'viewer'); i++);
>    return divs[i];
>
> }
>
> enjoy,
> -e
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to