Clearly explained. Sounds hopeful! > server.content-type is being used for the time being until there is > some consensus on where the type information should go.
That sounds fine to me, and make the most sense for TiddlyWeb/TiddlySpace. I guess a plugin could take the content-type from elsewhere, e.g. a slice and then default to the field for missing slice values, or vice-versa. -- Paul (psd) http://blog.whatfettle.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
