On Oct 13, 1:32 pm, [email protected] wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Tobias Beer wrote: > > I would certainly understand if this overly stretched TiddlyWeb's > > current design tenets. > > Not TiddlyWeb's. TiddlyWeb itself has very flexible policies on bags > that would allow the stuff you describe. > > In TiddlySpace the UI does not expose all that flexibility. Whether > that is a "yet" or not is unknown. We're still exploring. I think it is ok for TiddlySpace, to keep the UI as simple as possible. Most users like/need it that way.
On the other hand, I see some posts, which suggest to implement "features" into tiddlyspace, which are allready part of tiddlyWeb. But needs some type of "backwards" engineering to make it happen with tiddlyspace. I think it would be cooler, to invest some time into hoster and push it torwards tiddlyspace for ADMINS, instead of making tiddlyspace more complicated. my 2€ents. mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
