Somewhere along this thread I read that the discussion is about some +-300 active issues. I would suggest that someone (preferably @Osmosoft) took a few days to browse through them... prioritize the issues (by a beforehand agreed upon evaluation scheme) - see Martin's points - and move whatever is deemed important enough to the new system ...not waiting for anyone else - perhaps new to tw-and-its- shiny-new-git-thingy - to be searching through abandoned (trac) archives for some unresolved backlogs.
As for issues like the (in)famous paragraph (and list) structure, I would certainly think that those should be found when searched via the new issue tracker. I would also think that the kind of tabula rasa - as favoured by a felt majority in this thread - eventually means a whole lot more work than just copying over at least the bigger part of what simply does not deserve to be in an archived state. In any case, if things should initially be moved out of trac, they should definetely be REMOVED from trac and not redundantly stay in a frozen archived state as well... which is another reason why I would certainly favour an initial clean up. It's housekeeping and as such somewhat essential. Just putting things out of view in a big cellar will NOT help anyone... at least try and get the new frontdoor as well as the cellar organized at the beginning ...otherwise the cellar is nothing short from a landfill site making it hard to find what in fact was not meant to be dumped into some abandoned place like that. That's my 5 cts, Cheers, Tobias. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
