Taking to heart your suggestion of "cleaning up the cellar" before we move house, I've created a new milestone in Trac "2011.cleanup". I, and other members of the Osmosoft team, will start moving tickets we think shouldn't be fixed to there.
Having a milestone with all these tickets makes the review process public and easily visible: everyone is encouraged to look at this milestone and raise any disagreements, that is tickets they believe should be fixed. Disagreement can be raised either by re-opening the ticket, or making a comment in this group. Note that marking a ticket as "won't fix" and moving it to the 2011.cleanup milestone is not a firm decision not to fix the ticket, rather it is a statement of intent - "This ticket won't get fixed unless someone objects". So, I repeat, people are encouraged to object if they disagree with a decision about a ticket. Hopefully this will get the number of outstanding tickets down to a reasonable number, so that the migration to the new ticketing system will be easier. Martin On 1 February 2011 22:08, Tobias Beer <[email protected]> wrote: > Somewhere along this thread I read that the discussion is about some > +-300 active issues. I would suggest that someone (preferably > @Osmosoft) took a few days to browse through them... prioritize the > issues (by a beforehand agreed upon evaluation scheme) - see Martin's > points - and move whatever is deemed important enough to the new > system ...not waiting for anyone else - perhaps new to tw-and-its- > shiny-new-git-thingy - to be searching through abandoned (trac) > archives for some unresolved backlogs. > > As for issues like the (in)famous paragraph (and list) structure, I > would certainly think that those should be found when searched via the > new issue tracker. I would also think that the kind of tabula rasa - > as favoured by a felt majority in this thread - eventually means a > whole lot more work than just copying over at least the bigger part of > what simply does not deserve to be in an archived state. > > In any case, if things should initially be moved out of trac, they > should definetely be REMOVED from trac and not redundantly stay in a > frozen archived state as well... which is another reason why I would > certainly favour an initial clean up. It's housekeeping and as such > somewhat essential. > > Just putting things out of view in a big cellar will NOT help > anyone... at least try and get the new frontdoor as well as the cellar > organized at the beginning ...otherwise the cellar is nothing short > from a landfill site making it hard to find what in fact was not meant > to be dumped into some abandoned place like that. > > That's my 5 cts, > > > Cheers, Tobias. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWikiDev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
