> To get things started I went ahead and today created a cooker repo > and imported the existing cooker "stuff" into it.
Looks good - thanks Chris! > Presumably a next step with cook and ginsu would be to package them > in a proper Ruby way +1 > I thought we'd decided *not* to import the history. I don't think we did. As explained before, I believe retaining *code* history is important. > [discarding history is] certainly my preference. I'm willing to be > persuaded otherwise I don't see any significant benefit in discarding code history (in contrast to discarding stale tickets, which we agreed was useful). For TiddlyWiki in particular, the source code and its evolution are often the only clues as to why things are the way they are - so discarding that would be actively harmful. (Due to things like git-blame, it's not as simple as looking it up at another URI - again, unlike with tickets.) -- F. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
