Colm,

I am trialing the plugin. There are some behaviors that seem strange.
It doesn't seem to always work in the same way.

I'll keep you posted of patterns i find

ALex

On 11 May 2011 07:04, Alex Hough <[email protected]> wrote:
> Colm,
>
> I see your approach. Get the tids by modified //then// find the missing links.
>
> I was exploring
> getMissingLinks(modified);
>
> Alex
>
> On 9 May 2011 18:50, Alex Hough <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Not sure what you mean by *noise*, could you explain this further?
>>
>> Yes. Under missing you often get missing's that are useless and not
>> worth making into a tiddler. For example the "A4K" listed under
>> missing on TW.com.
>>
>> When I make notes, I make a missing link as a reminder. When thinking
>> back I think about how long ago it was, not alphabetically. The
>> provisional title might not be the one I end up using. I might even
>> pass it by, the idea could have been useless. Instead of this
>> cluttering the missing, I would like for it to sink to the bottom of
>> the pile. Once it is at a certian depth it can disappear from view.
>>
>> I might then want to systematically review my missing links, then the
>> existing missing would be great.
>>
>>
>>> It orders he missing links by the modified date of the tiddler they
>>> appear in.  You can use it like this:
>>> <<list latestmissing>>
>>
>> This is just what I was looking for
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ALex
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.

Reply via email to