>> However the getMissingLinks function won't ever need to sort via a >> field because it just returns an array of strings not a collection >> of tiddler objects so there isn't anything to sort on. > > Not exactly true. [...] Thus, there is already work being done to > retrieve tiddler data associated with the link (or it's container) > and those data values could be used to sort the resulting list
Fair point - however, I believe Colm was referring to the current state of getMissingLinks, where his assessment is correct. What you describe sounds like a potential feature request - a reasonable one too, though I guess it's YAGNI for now*. The fact that the parameter already existed seems like coincidence. -- F. * I haven't been following this thread in detail though -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev?hl=en.
