Hi Ramon The easiest option might be to use the full code block syntax for these situations, rather than the inline syntax, on the basis that your text is less likely to include triple backticks.
The other option is to disable the single back tick parse rule, and then use explicit <code> tags to mark your code runs. For example: \rules except codeinline Some text and <code>a code block including `back ticks`</code> The rules pragma needs to be on the first line of the tiddler. Does that help? Best wishes Jeremy On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:32 PM, ramon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Random user dropping in with a question. > > I read that for code I can either use backticks for in line examples or > three back ticks for a code block. > > However, what's supposed to happen if the code string contains backticks? > > e.g. A="`echo | tr '\012' '\001' `" > > At the moment I'm getting bits of this showing as code and bits not, both > as an in line example and in a code block. > > Is there a way to make it all show as code? > > -ramon. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWikiDev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
