Hi Jeremy!
Again a situation where some escaping mechanism seems to be required.
Shouldn't we think about a real general way of escaping and thus making
characters literal?
OTOH: For this situation, what about this rule?
` - Standard inline code as you implemented it
``` - Standard block as you implemented it
`` - New inline code, like ` but ending at the next `` So simple ` can be
used inside.
Just to drop some unsorted ideas: I pretty much like the Perl way of
quoting. In Perl ANY character can be used as a single or double quote like
this
qX...X - single quote from X to next X
qqX...X - double quote from X to next X
X could be any character or a set of brackets: (), <>, [], {}.
So qAtestA and q(test) would both quote "test" in single quotes.
Maybe a similar approach could be adopted for TW5?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
