Hi Jeremy,
Not sure if you saw my comment on GitHub, but what do you think about
defining the macro body in a separate tiddler? Something like \define
{new-tiddler-test} mySkelaton()
The reason I like the x-tiddler serial format so much is because (1) it
is already made, and (2) it does everything in what seems to be an easy to
use format. The only thing I'm not sure about is backward compatibility
within the navigator widget. Currently, I look for a linebreak in the param
string and if there isn't one then use the old getTiddler method. However,
this constrains us to using multiple lines going forward. Maybe that
doesn't matter. Maybe it does. What do you think?
The fieldmangler widget is getting a new attribute so it isn't affected
as far as backward compatibility.
--Arlen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
