Here is a gist showing the changes to macrodef.js that would be necessary. https://gist.github.com/Arlen22/11149813
I copied in the current version first, so if you click revisions you can see the changes I made. Enjoy! --Arlen On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Arlen Beiler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > Not sure if you saw my comment on GitHub, but what do you think about > defining the macro body in a separate tiddler? Something like \define > {new-tiddler-test} mySkelaton() > The reason I like the x-tiddler serial format so much is because (1) > it is already made, and (2) it does everything in what seems to be an easy > to use format. The only thing I'm not sure about is backward compatibility > within the navigator widget. Currently, I look for a linebreak in the param > string and if there isn't one then use the old getTiddler method. However, > this constrains us to using multiple lines going forward. Maybe that > doesn't matter. Maybe it does. What do you think? > The fieldmangler widget is getting a new attribute so it isn't > affected as far as backward compatibility. > > --Arlen > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
