On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 12:41:53 AM UTC+1, Daniel Baird wrote: > > After the user clicks delete... > .--------------------------------. > | Tiddler A | > | | > | tiddler A's content | > '--------------------------------' > > New Tiddler deleted! ( undo ) > > It would mean that there's a state of existence for tiddlers that is > "ghost" or something -- killed but not yet gone to the afterlife. So it's > a big commitment architecturally. >
I like this idea of the "undo button". It would speed up tiddler handling quite a bit. How long should "ghosts" hang around? The tiddler could be renamed to $:/state/ghost/New Tiddler, which would be overwritten by the next ghost named "New Tiddler" If state/ghost would not be saved, ghosts will hang around till you do a browser refresh. A tiddler $:/ghosts could contain a table of all ghosts, + a resurrect button. ... I think there is no new functionality needed. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
