On Friday, January 16, 2015 at 2:11:32 PM UTC, PMario wrote:
>
> ltr: File TW, TidlySpot, hoster [3], TiddlySpace, localhost:8080 (nodejs 
> tiddlywiki) 
> [snip]
>
> [3] https://tank.peermore.com/
>

I just thought I would remind that hoster and tank are two different 
services and both continue to run on my server. hoster's code isn't getting 
any updates, but it's still running at http://hoster.peermore.com/ and may 
be of interest, at least as a way of examining the evolution of multi-user 
server sides.

I think (as your document mostly makes clear) that it is important to 
distinguish between TiddlyWeb -- which is the API, library, framework for 
doing expressive server side manipulations of tiddlers and collections 
thereof -- and tiddler hosting services like Hoster, TiddlySpace and Tank 
which provide a variety of (multi-)user experiences on top of TiddlyWeb.

I think we can argue pretty well that TiddlyWeb is a pretty mature 
expression of its API and does what it says on the tin quite well.

On the other hand we are yet to see an implementation of the multi-user 
experience that has received anywhere near as much attention to detail as 
TiddlyWeb itself:

* Hoster was an experiment (by me) to demonstrate (to Osmosoft) that a 
multi-user service was possible and that it was worth Osmosoft making a 
concerted effort to create one.
* That effort was supposed to be TiddlySpace but as those with long 
memories will know, while there were several valiant efforts to get the 
entire group (with all their diverse skills) working on the project 
consistently over a long period of time, organizational difficulties meant 
those efforts never really saw full fruit. Yes there's a nice service there 
for some purposes, but it never really reached the full promises described 
in all the various planning spaces that got created over time. The github 
repo for TiddlySpace suggests that nobody is working the core TiddlySpace 
code anymore (the last commit was from me a year ago).
* Tank was my way of keeping myself busy after Osmosoft let me go and while 
I had pneumonia. I wanted to create a tool that would be useful to me (I 
use it every day now) but figured why not make it available to everyone 
else as well.

I think TiddlyWeb demonstrates that I'm pretty good at making useful APIs 
and backends that are flexible and powerful. I think that hoster and tank 
demonstrate that I either lack the skills or motivation (probably a 
combination of both) to create a glorious user experience for the general 
population.

I'd be very curious to see what would happen if a group with the right set 
of skills set their mind to creating a multi-user experience that has the 
same attention to detail as TiddlyWeb.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to