Adrian et all, There seems to me to be two issues, the structure of the documentation and the knowledge within it. There are great resources out there that document many details well, however they often suit a particular audience well, but rarely for the newby (if it does its over simple). If we can establish a suitable structure (perhaps multiples) and bring in content from the other resources, we can then have an ongoing conversation about the details. Adding a feature not unlike Wikipedia where a discussion can take place, versions and rollback are possible would then help.
Perhaps one of the experienced members can build a multi-contributor wiki on which we can structure the content. We could also indicate the source eg; tiddlyWiki.com so we can refer back and propose updates. Just brainstorming Tony -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/7704bb60-2a36-4720-98ed-21a0216e7029%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
