Ciao Jeremy and all This is a comment slightly from a weird position (probably) from your point of view. I'm not thinking here as a developer. I'm thinking as a social anthropologist.
I am reading several discussions at the moment about proposals for innovation in development process, documentation and addressing user needs better. I am, frankly, feeling some of this effort could be wasted because IMO the single biggest danger with TW is *yet more fragmentation*. The GitHub side is the most integrated and consistent at the moment. Out in the world of end-users some of us are struggling to join-the-informational-dots of the scattered resources so everyone knows what is where. just finding things, plugins, tutorials, example TW etc is almost a full-time job. On the dev end my concern is: could the desire to improve actually have unintended consequences that actually increase fragmentation? Just thoughts Josiah Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > *My point wasn't about access control. It was that I am not in favour of > splitting the TW5 repo up* (e.g. moving each translation to its own > repo). The reason is that it becomes harder for users of the repo to > manage, making sure that they have cloned the right repos, and that they > are all synced together. The current state will always be in sync, but it > is hard to, say, reconstruct what the repos looked like on 11th May 2016. > This is a somewhat controversial area but this "monorepo” philosophy is > widely practiced for large scale projects (e.g. Google stores billions of > lines of code in a single repo). > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/74e85ee1-5907-4d8b-ace2-c7b3b5838f5c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
