Ciao PMario I emailed David about this thread ... he replied ...
*I would hope that the people to whom you wrote would feel free to use the > info in my toolmap to create similar things according to the criteria they > set.* > A notable point about Dynalist is that its exportable as OPML. Just about the simplest format imaginable. It would be easy to migrate to anything. The really hard work on these resources is getting a starting point. That is there. Needs perfecting, but its there. PMario wrote: > > It's not this single project I'm aiming at. I want to have the possibility > to cover all projects listed there, where it makes sense __and__ If their > authors want to! > IMO the issue is bang-for-buck. Meaning "what resources are the least work to garner and hone for the objective?" I think TiddlyToolMap is a pretty much number one because of its scope. Its weak in few areas (like setup), but not many compared to everything else. Best wishes Josiah -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/33cd1f22-37c7-42f3-9c29-2826c584b464%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
