Josiah,

I have being looking closely at the optimum way to represent all resources 
us TiddlyWiki enthusiasts use in the process of developing a Community 
resource website, also within my own network of wikis I have built informal 
standards around storing such things in Tiddlers. This is not yet 
exhaustive but that is where I am headed.

It is critical to develop such methods as tiddlywiki can generate a lot of 
details people can make use of, for example in my MyMenus plugin every menu 
item can also be a code snip-it people can use and I have almost 100 of 
these and I have only started.

Basing everything on a tiddler model makes sense because they immediately 
become shareable, and can carry the required tags to make them work.

My own method includes creating fields such as field-caption menu-caption 
to define "field tiddlers" and "menu tiddler "and where ever a macro is 
defined in a tiddler a field macro-macroname with the "syntax" in the field 
value etc... is another standard.

Some reoccurring objects in tiddlywiki  such as macros, buttons etc... are 
often already grouped using the relevant system tag that results in their 
display, which may be a sensible way 
- view template additions  $:/tags/ViewTemplate for the view template
- view toolbar additions $:/tags/ViewToolbar for the view mode tiddler 
toolbar
- edit toolbar additions $:/tags/EditorToolbar

Note that there are some cases where an Item could be validly tagged with 
more than one

So If we take the urls from TiddlyToolMap we could create tiddlers that 
have say the tiddllywiki-resource field containing the url, use the title 
and description fields even an icon if one is available.

It would be quite easy to build some macros that display and list such 
items intelligently.

I suppose my point is this is about knowledge and information management 
and we have the perfect tool for this, tiddlywiki all we need to do is 
promote some defacto standards and share them.

Regards
Tony

On Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 1:39:24 AM UTC+10, @TiddlyTweeter wrote:
>
> David Gifford's TiddlyToolMap 
> <https://dynalist.io/d/zUP-nIWu2FFoXH-oM7L7d9DM> has succinctly 
> illustrated THE way to solve much of the fragmentation of resources 
> TiddlyWiki lays in adopting structures for shared info on (a) resources; 
> (b) documentation. 
>
> TiddlyToolMap emerged from David's own frustration of not being able to 
> find what he needed at the time he needed it. 
>
> His solution was simple: collect on a list, with basic categories, links 
> to major useful innovations.
>
> Its imperfect, not comprehensive, somewhat messy when looking at items as 
> there is no standard of presentation, and it includes nothing about whether 
> a solution will all work in all TW generations. 
>
> BUT the key points are: 
>
>    - largely it works; 
>
>
>    - its the only attempt of its kind currently alive; 
>
>
>    - he is happy its taken on, as he says: *I would hope that ... people 
>    ... would feel free to use the info in my toolmap to create similar things 
>    according to the criteria they set.*
>
>
>    - most IMPORTANT, it is being picked up on in the wild as a major 
>    resource repository ... see, for instance, this German blog post: 
>    https://toolblog.de/2018/06/16/die-ultimative-liste-fuer-tiddlywiki/? 
>
> TiddlyToolMap is a VERY good example of "auto-marketing". 
>
> It fills a need, and despite being very crude in structure, and sometimes 
> painful to use, it DOES "hit the spot" of "Wider Use". It appeals. Is 
> increasingly used. And addresses the lack of a full Resource Base elsewhere.
>
> It is for these reasons I ask you help to develop a BASIC DATA FORMAT FOR 
> RESOURCES (i.e. a list of minimal fields that can capture and organise 
> plugins, macros and documentation) so that David's resource could be 
> exported in a FORM that can be used and developed and NOT get lost.
>
> Yes?
>
> Please feel free to ask questions if anything I wrote needs clarifying.
>
> Best wishes
> Josiah
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/d746a632-9e62-45c4-9b67-fc6e15614760%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to