Ciao Mat I fully agree with you. What you propose would simplify the current situation to good benefit for many use cases.
Here is a USE CASE: I create a series of several hundred Tiddlers of Film Title data. Once created a film student will often want to revise the content of various fields (e.g. YearReleased, Synopsis, AspectReatio, LogLine etc) of a Tiddler without entering the full editor. Handling other Tiddlers in order to help process the data on a larger data set like that can get over-complicated. Far better for this type of app. to have one Tiddler per record and no dependencies. Would ... -- simplify user code -- make the life a "tweaker" easier. My 2 cents Josiah Mat wrote: > > This is a proposal to extend the EditTextWidget or possibly introduce a > new widget to be a simple-to-use unit for user input. > > *Problem* > The EditTextWidget does not work for modifying the *current* tiddler nor > for macros due to tiddler refresh after each entered character. And the > possible "circumventional solutions" put a lot of burden on the user and > forces use of additional tiddlers. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/124af483-26f7-42ed-9cee-aed9487bee53%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
